National Security Alarm: Congress Investigates Trump Crypto’s UAE Links

Congressional Investigation Intensifies: Trump Family’s Crypto Venture Under Scrutiny for Foreign Capital Links

The U.S. Congress has launched a significant investigation into World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a cryptocurrency enterprise linked to the Trump family. This congressional inquiry, spearheaded by the House, aims to uncover potential undue entanglements between WLFI, foreign sovereign capital, and U.S. technology policy, raising critical questions about national security and conflicts of interest.

The Genesis of the Investigation: Alleged UAE Stake

This probe was triggered by a recent Wall Street Journal exposé, which revealed allegations that an entity closely associated with the United Arab Emirates (UAE) secretly agreed to acquire a substantial 49% stake in World Liberty Financial for $500 million. This reported deal, said to have been struck ahead of former President Trump’s potential inauguration in early 2025, immediately ignited concerns across Washington regarding potential conflicts of interest and significant national security risks.

Congressional Scrutiny: Demands for Transparency

Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA), a prominent member of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, has formally initiated the investigation by dispatching a detailed letter to World Liberty Financial. The letter demands comprehensive documentation, including the company’s full equity structure, detailed profit distribution records, and internal communication logs. The investigation specifically targets potential conflicts of interest, national security implications related to AI chip export controls, and the precise role of World Liberty Financial’s USD1 stablecoin in a reported $2 billion investment by Abu Dhabi’s MGX in Binance.

Key Areas of Inquiry: Financial Flows and Foreign Ties

Khanna’s correspondence presses World Liberty Financial to verify several critical details. Among these are questions regarding whether $187 million in funds were indeed transferred to entities associated with the Trump family, and if additional payments were made to affiliates or related parties of the company’s co-founders. Furthermore, Congress has requested exhaustive data on Aryam Investment 1—the UAE-based firm mentioned in reports—including its equity structure, profit distribution records, board appointment details, and due diligence documentation.

The Stablecoin and Binance Connection

A significant focus of the congressional inquiry revolves around World Liberty Financial’s proprietary stablecoin, USD1. This digital asset was reportedly utilized by MGX, an Abu Dhabi investment firm, in its substantial $2 billion investment into the cryptocurrency exchange Binance. Lawmakers, including Rep. Khanna, are seeking clarity on why USD1 was chosen as the settlement stablecoin for this transaction, the actual financial benefits World Liberty Financial derived from the deal, and whether any company personnel were involved in discussions pertaining to the presidential pardon later granted to Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ).

Mandate for Data Preservation and March 1 Deadline

The Committee has issued a stringent directive, mandating that World Liberty Financial diligently preserve all electronic communications and internal policy documents. This preservation order specifically applies to records concerning potential conflicts of interest, export control compliance, and all interactions with entities based in the UAE and China.

World Liberty Financial is required to submit all requested information to Congress by the deadline of March 1.


Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for market information purposes. All content and views expressed herein are for reference only and do not constitute investment advice. They do not represent the opinions or positions of the author or the publisher. Investors are advised to make their own decisions and conduct their own transactions. Neither the author nor the publisher will bear any responsibility for direct or indirect losses incurred by investors based on their transactions.

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may also like these